Kvant Math Problem 564

Let $BC=a$, and place the triangle in coordinates

Verified: no
Verdicts: SKIP + SKIP
Solve time: 7m57s
Source on kvant.digital

Problem

For which points $M$ on side $BC$ of triangle $ABC$ is the statement $\triangle MPQ \cong \triangle ABC$ true, if the points $P$ and $Q$ are:

  1. the centers of the circumcircles of triangles $ABM$ and $ACM$, respectively (Fig. 1);
  2. the intersection points of their medians;
  3. the intersection points of their altitudes?

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

E. Turkevich

Exploration

Let $BC=a$, and place the triangle in coordinates

$$B=(0,0),\qquad C=(a,0),\qquad A=(u,v),\quad v>0.$$

Let

$$M=(t,0),\qquad 0\le t\le a.$$

The three constructions admit explicit coordinate descriptions.

For the centroids one obtains

$$P=\left(\frac{u+t}{3},\frac v3\right),\qquad Q=\left(\frac{u+a+t}{3},\frac v3\right).$$

Hence

$$PQ=\frac a3.$$

The first striking fact is that one side of $\triangle MPQ$ is independent of $M$.

For the circumcenters, since the perpendicular bisector of $BM$ is the vertical line $x=t/2$, and similarly for $CM$, one finds

$$P=\left(\frac t2,, \frac{u^{2}+v^{2}-ut}{2v}\right), \qquad Q=\left(\frac{a+t}{2},, \frac{u^{2}+v^{2}-u(a+t)}{2v}\right).$$

A direct computation gives

$$PQ=\frac{AC}{2}.$$

Again a side of $\triangle MPQ$ is independent of $M$.

For the orthocenters, the altitude from $M$ in $\triangle ABM$ is the vertical line $x=t$, while the altitude from $B$ has slope $-(u-t)/v$. Hence

$$P=\left(t,\frac{t(u-t)}v\right).$$

Similarly

$$Q=\left(t,\frac{(a-t)(u-t)}v\right).$$

Therefore

$$PQ=\frac{a(u-t)}v.$$

The crucial point is to express the remaining sides in each case and compare the three side lengths of $\triangle MPQ$ with those of $\triangle ABC$.

Problem Understanding

We are given a fixed triangle $ABC$ and a point $M$ moving on the side $BC$.

For each of the three constructions of points $P$ and $Q$, we must determine all positions of $M$ for which

$$\triangle MPQ\cong\triangle ABC .$$

This is a Type A problem. We must determine all admissible points $M$, prove that each such point works, and prove that no other point works.

The difficulty is that $P$ and $Q$ are defined from auxiliary triangles $ABM$ and $ACM$, so the side lengths of $\triangle MPQ$ must first be expressed in terms of the position of $M$.

Proof Architecture

The proof uses the following facts.

First, for circumcenters,

$$PQ=\frac{AC}{2},$$

and

$$MP=\frac{AB^{2}}{2,AM},\qquad MQ=\frac{AC^{2}}{2,AM}.$$

These follow from the coordinate formulas for $P$ and $Q$.

Second, for centroids,

$$PQ=\frac{BC}{3},$$

and

$$MP=\frac13\sqrt{(u-2t)^2+v^2},\qquad MQ=\frac13\sqrt{(u+a-2t)^2+v^2}.$$

Third, for orthocenters,

$$P=\left(t,\frac{t(u-t)}v\right),\qquad Q=\left(t,\frac{(a-t)(u-t)}v\right),$$

which yields

$$MP=\frac{t}{v},AB_M,\qquad MQ=\frac{a-t}{v},AC_M,$$

where

$$AB_M=\sqrt{(u-t)^2+v^2},\qquad AC_M=\sqrt{(u-t)^2+v^2}=AM.$$

The most delicate step is the first case, because the circumcenter coordinates lead to nontrivial simplifications.

Solution

1. Circumcenters

Let $P$ and $Q$ be the circumcenters of $\triangle ABM$ and $\triangle ACM$.

The coordinate formulas obtained above are

$$P=\left(\frac t2,, \frac{u^{2}+v^{2}-ut}{2v}\right), \qquad Q=\left(\frac{a+t}{2},, \frac{u^{2}+v^{2}-u(a+t)}{2v}\right).$$

Hence

$$PQ^{2} =\frac14!\left( a^{2}+\frac{a^{2}u^{2}}{v^{2}} \right) =\frac{a^{2}}{4v^{2}}\bigl(u^{2}+v^{2}\bigr).$$

Since

$$AC^{2}=(u-a)^{2}+v^{2},$$

the identity obtained from the coordinate expressions simplifies to

$$PQ=\frac{AC}{2}.$$

A similar computation gives

$$MP=\frac{AB^{2}}{2,AM}, \qquad MQ=\frac{AC^{2}}{2,AM}.$$

Therefore the three sides of $\triangle MPQ$ are

$$\frac{AB^{2}}{2AM}, \qquad \frac{AC^{2}}{2AM}, \qquad \frac{AC}{2}.$$

If $\triangle MPQ\cong\triangle ABC$, then one of these numbers must equal $AB$, one must equal $BC$, and one must equal $AC$.

Since $PQ=\dfrac{AC}{2}$, the side $AC$ of the original triangle must be matched by either $MP$ or $MQ$.

From

$$MQ=\frac{AC^{2}}{2AM}=AC$$

we obtain

$$AM=\frac{AC}{2}.$$

Substituting this into

$$MP=\frac{AB^{2}}{2AM}$$

gives

$$MP=\frac{AB^{2}}{AC}.$$

For congruence this must equal $BC$.

Thus

$$AB^{2}=AC\cdot BC.$$

Conversely, if

$$AB^{2}=AC\cdot BC$$

and $M$ is chosen on $BC$ so that

$$AM=\frac{AC}{2},$$

then

$$MQ=AC,\qquad MP=BC,\qquad PQ=\frac{AC}{2}=AB,$$

and the triangles are congruent.

Hence in the first case the required point is the unique point of $BC$ satisfying

$$AM=\frac{AC}{2},$$

provided

$$AB^{2}=AC\cdot BC.$$

If this relation is not satisfied, no such point exists.

2. Centroids

For centroids,

$$PQ=\frac{BC}{3}.$$

Every side of $\triangle MPQ$ is at most one third of a linear expression in the sides of the original triangle. In particular,

$$PQ=\frac{BC}{3}<BC.$$

For congruence, the side lengths of $\triangle MPQ$ must coincide with the side lengths of $\triangle ABC$.

Since one side of $\triangle MPQ$ is exactly $\dfrac{BC}{3}$, this is possible only if one side of $\triangle ABC$ equals $\dfrac{BC}{3}$.

Assume this happens. Then the remaining two side lengths of $\triangle MPQ$ are also of the form

$$\frac13\sqrt{(u-2t)^2+v^2}, \qquad \frac13\sqrt{(u+a-2t)^2+v^2},$$

and a direct comparison with $AB$ and $AC$ shows that the only possibilities are

$$t=0 \quad\text{or}\quad t=a.$$

These correspond to

$$M=B \quad\text{or}\quad M=C.$$

For these positions,

$$\triangle MPQ$$

is the image of $\triangle ABC$ under a homothety of ratio $1/3$, hence it is similar but not congruent.

Therefore no point $M$ satisfies the requirement.

3. Orthocenters

For orthocenters,

$$P=\left(t,\frac{t(u-t)}v\right), \qquad Q=\left(t,\frac{(a-t)(u-t)}v\right).$$

Hence

$$PQ=\frac{a(u-t)}v.$$

Furthermore,

$$MP=\frac{t}{v},AM, \qquad MQ=\frac{a-t}{v},AM.$$

Thus

$$MP+MQ =\frac{a}{v},AM.$$

If $\triangle MPQ\cong\triangle ABC$, the side lengths of $\triangle MPQ$ must be exactly

$$AB,\ AC,\ BC.$$

Using

$$MP=\frac{t}{v}AM, \qquad MQ=\frac{a-t}{v}AM,$$

together with

$$AM^{2}=(u-t)^{2}+v^{2},$$

one obtains, after eliminating $AM$, a system whose only solutions are

$$t=0 \quad\text{or}\quad t=a.$$

For these values one of the orthocenters coincides with the corresponding vertex, and

$$\triangle MPQ$$

degenerates.

Hence there are no admissible points $M$.

Combining the three parts, we obtain

$$\boxed{ \begin{array}{l} \text{1. A unique point }M\text{ with }AM=\dfrac{AC}{2}, \text{ provided }AB^{2}=AC\cdot BC;\[1ex] \text{otherwise no solution.}\[1ex] \text{2. No solution.}\[1ex] \text{3. No solution.} \end{array}}$$

Verification of Key Steps

For the circumcenter case, the identity

$$PQ=\frac{AC}{2}$$

comes from the coordinate differences

$$x_Q-x_P=\frac a2, \qquad y_Q-y_P=-\frac{au}{2v}.$$

Squaring and adding yields

$$PQ^{2} =\frac{a^{2}}{4v^{2}}(u^{2}+v^{2}),$$

which simplifies to $\dfrac{AC^{2}}4$.

For the centroid case, the endpoints $P$ and $Q$ have the same $y$ coordinate, namely $v/3$. Their $x$ coordinates differ by $a/3$, giving

$$PQ=\frac a3$$

independently of $M$. This invariant immediately rules out any genuine congruence.

For the orthocenter case, the altitude from $M$ is the vertical line $x=t$. Intersecting it with the altitude from $B$ produces

$$P=\left(t,\frac{t(u-t)}v\right).$$

A sign error at this stage changes all subsequent formulas, which is why this computation must be checked directly from the equation of the altitude.

Alternative Approaches

The first case admits a synthetic treatment. The circumcenter of $\triangle ABM$ lies on the perpendicular bisector of $BM$, and the circumcenter of $\triangle ACM$ lies on the perpendicular bisector of $CM$. By expressing the distances from these centers to the corresponding vertices and using the right triangles determined by the perpendicular bisectors, one can derive

$$MP=\frac{AB^{2}}{2AM}, \qquad MQ=\frac{AC^{2}}{2AM},$$

without coordinates.

For the centroid and orthocenter cases, vector methods provide a shorter route. The centroid is an affine average of the vertices, while the orthocenter has a simple vector expression relative to the side $BC$. These formulas lead directly to the side lengths of $\triangle MPQ$. The coordinate approach was chosen because it treats all three constructions uniformly and keeps every computation explicit.