Rough automatic draft, low quality: expect mistakes and awkward wording. It will be replaced by a better translation. Original →
53
SOMETHING ABOUT RADICALAX
A. G. MORDKOVICH
“And now,” said the Examiner, “I want to offer you one more task, a very simple one.” Here it is:
Find the sides of a right triangle if it is known that the projection of one kamet on the sinomendus is 6 cm, and the projection of another kamet is 1.5 cm less than the length of this kamet.
… A few minutes later the Applicant goes to the Examiner together.
Well, how did you solve the problem? - asked the Examiner.
Yes! - answered the Entrant.
And what happened?
— The problem has no solution.
And you can prove it?
Certainly! Consider triangle ABC (see figure); C is the top of a right angle, CH is the height. Let AC = x, then by condition AH = = x—1.5, and BH = 6.
54
We use the known relation CH2=BH⋅AH or CH2=6(x−1,5).
Applying the Pythagorean theorem to the right triangle ACH, we obtain
AC2−CH2=AH,
that is
x2−6(x−1,5)=x−1,5.
“Well, so far everything is correct,” the Examiner noted, “although we must say that the solution path chosen was not the most rational.”
“And then,” continued the Entrant, “there are simple calculations left:
x2−6x+9=x−1,5;(x−3)2=x−1,5;
x−3=x−1,5;−3=−1,5.
Since the last equality is false, the problem has no solution.
“Unfortunately, I must disappoint you,” said the Examiner, “the problem has a solution.” It can be solved, for example, like this: from the known relation AC2=AB⋅AH we have x2=(x+4,5)(x−1,5),3x=4,5⋅1,5 and x=2,25, that is, AC=2,25 cm. Then AB=6,75 cm, and BC=42 cm.
And, catching the Applicant’s puzzled look, the Examiner added:
You are apparently interested in where the error is in your reasoning. Well, let’s figure it out.
WHERE IS THE ERROR?
“You remember,” the Examiner began, “that I, although with a reservation, approved your geometric reasoning.” So the error could only have occurred in what you called “simple calculations.” More precisely, an error was made when extracting the square root. You did not teach that, according to the meaning of the problem, the quantity (x−3)2 must be positive. And in general, in the field of real numbers, the sign implies the arithmetic, non-negative value of the root. So, 16=4, and you cannot write that 16=−4 or 16=±4. Therefore, it cannot be said that a2=a is always: for a≥0 this equality is true, but the number a can also be negative! Simplify, for example, (−3)2:
The applicant wrote:
(−3)2=9=3.
Right. In other words,
(−3)2=−(−3).
And in general, if a<0, then a2=−a.
Thus,
a2={a,еслиa≥0,−a,еслиa<0.
“I understand,” exclaimed the Applicant, “this can be briefly written as follows: a2=∣a∣, because the model a is defined in exactly the same way:
∣a∣={a,еслиa≥0,−a,еслиa<0.
Absolutely right. It’s exactly the same in your problem: you can’t write
Next we should consider two cases: 1) x−3≥0; 2) x−3<0. You only considered the first case, so the conclusion that the problem has no solution was made prematurely. In the second case ∣x−3∣=−(x−3). Then from the equation −(x−3)=x−1,5 we obtain x=2,25, that is, AC=2,25 cm.
“Everything is clear,” said the Entrant.
In this case, we will consider our conversation finished. To beg your pardon, let me give you the following advice:
Don’t forget that a2=∣a∣!
We will discuss this with the Applicant and the Examiner, but we will take the Examiner’s advice into account. In particular, we will use it when solving the following example.
Since by condition x>a≥0, then ∣Vaˉ−x∣=−Vaˉ+x, ∣Vaˉ+xˉ∣=a+x, and this expression is transformed as follows:
x−Vaˉ+x+a+x=2x.
A FEW WORDS ABOUT THE PROPERTIES OF RADICALS
When solving examples of actions with radicals, one has to use various properties of radicals. So, in example 1 we used, and quite carefreely, the well-known property:
ba=ba.
However, it should be taken into account that this equality occurs only in the case when a≥0 and b>0. If a and b are negative numbers, then the notation ba does not make sense in the field of real numbers. In example 1, on our part, no error occurred, since (Vaˉ−x)2>0, (Vaˉ+x)2>0 and, in addition, by condition x>0. But, in any case, from the above we can draw the following conclusion: you must be very careful when revealing the root (of the degree) of a product or a fraction. In the general case, when the sign of a and b is unknown, it is advisable to carry out the following reasoning:
ba=∣b∣∣a∣=∣b∣∣a∣.
56
So, if the numbers a and b have the same symbols, then
ba=∣b∣∣a∣
and similarly
ab=∣a∣⋅∣b∣.
Example 2: Simplify
a+xa−x+a−xa+x−a2−x16, if x=4(a−1).
Solution. Let us express, on the contrary, a through x: a=4x+4, and substitute it into this expression. It is converted like this:
We used - and this is often useful - the following property of the module: for all a and b
∣a∣⋅∣b∣=∣ab∣,∣a∣2=a2.
And now we will dwell on one more important property of the root.
Example 3: Simplify
1021(19+610)532−25.
Solution. People often think like this. Using the well-known property of the root, you can show the root of the second factor by multiplying by 2 and at the same time squaring the subordinate expression; we get
1021(19+610)532−25
=1021(19+610)10(32−25)2
=1021(19+610)10192−(610)2=101=1.
But there is a mistake here! The correct answer is minus one. The point is that 32−25<0 because (32)2=18<(25)2=20.
Therefore, it is not true that 532−25=10(32−25)2, but it is true that 532−25=−525−32=−10(25−32)2.
Example 4: Simplify 8(π2−10)4.
57
Here, too, it would be incorrect to simply divide the indicator of the root and radical expression by 4:
8(π2−10)4=π2−10
(the result does not make sense because π2<10). The following equality is true:
8(π2−10)4=10−π2.
As a result, we come to the following conclusion:
Using the basic properties of radicals in cases where you are not sure that the root contains a positive number, you need to ensure that, firstly, the result obtained makes sense (if necessary, the modulus sign will help us out) and, secondly, that the result obtained has the same sign as the first analogous expression.
TASKS
List the conditions under which the following equalities are true (k and n are natural numbers):
a) n−a=−na;
e) a⋅nb=nanb;
6) nan=a;
g) na=nak;
b) (na)n=a;
h) kna=ka;
d) na⋅b=na⋅nb;
i) (na)k=nak;
e) nba=nnbna;
j) if a<b, then na<nb.
Simplify the following expressions:
a) (a−1a+1+a+1a−1)⋅(a−1a+1−a+1a−1);
6) 2x3y+x3+3xy−2x3y+x3−3xy;
b) 2ma(m2−a2)−1/2(4a2m−2+a−2m2−4)−1/2⋅(2m4−m−2a2−1−a2m−22a2);
d) 32−5⋅69+45−3a2+3aa+2+5⋅12(9−45)3.